heather Champ is awesome. And this profile of the community and Champ does a nice job providing some background on how Flickr manages its community, the heart of the site. A couple weeks ago i found myself in a meeting rattling on about "the soul of a site". The folks in the room politely smiled, but i’m sure i didn’t make much sense. This article gets at it much better than i could have, by focusing on the "spirit of Flickr".
The essence of Champ’s job, she says, boils down to defending this
imprecise but holy "spirit of Flickr." Indeed, imprecision is an art
here. The list of community guidelines
is an assortment of lawyer-vexing instructions like "Don’t be creepy.
You know the guy. Don’t be that guy," and "Don’t forget the children."
If you’ve spent any time online, you instantly recognize these to be
meaningful and clear edicts. Champ is only half joking when she says
her is responsibility is to keep things from "encroaching on Flickr’s
"The job always comes down to finding the fulcrum in the
teeter-totter, the balance that benefits both the individual and the
community," she explains."
Great links, great comments, very helpful analysis of the options for rectifying the meltdown in the markets.
Link: To Splurge Or Not To Splurge.
Until Quantcast gets critical mass, or Google grows, we’re stuck with them. Link: ComScore: The Internet company everybody loves to hate – Sep. 26, 2008.
the guy that made the New Model Army happen for Cromwell. .Link: Philip Skippon, c.1600-60.
Media & Ad Agencies, where are you going to add value in the future? (I’ve got a long essay in my head about supply, demand, market liquidity and the role media and ad agencies play now and in the future. I don’t have time to write the whole thing up, but here’s the heart of it:
- Long term,
- Ad agencies and Media agencies are in for it
- The value they provide is being marginalized
- As the innefficiencies of the ad marketplace
- Get automated (see google, Yahoo APT,)
- or turned into markets (see ad exchanges).
- There’s a growing price volatility in the ad impressions market, since
- there the number of publishers is exploding…
- and they can create a virtually unlimted number of ad impressions.
- There are more dollars flowing into the online ad space, but ultimately that "demand" won’t ever be able match all the supply
- We’re already seeing crazy bad sell through rates on leading sites by direct sales teams so…
- Publishers are turning to networks to offload the inventory and try to get some revenue for it, even if it’s a fifth of what they could get by selling it directly…
- Which is accelerating the decline in prices…
- Creating more opportunities for advertisers to be aggressive with their digital media planning and buying policies
- media success becomes a pricing game, where efficiencies drive more exposure.
- HINT: The value media agencies have in the future will shift from planning the program to reach the audience (which is getting increasingly automated and just plain easier than ever) into exploiting marketplace pricing inefficiencies, driving more value for the client through a price advantage vs. a planning advantage.
Stuff like this ( Yahoo Overhauls System for Selling Display Ads – NYTimes.com.) will only accelerate that.
Looks like some serious self-reflection, though. Link: Live MIXX Blog Day 2 – Back for More – IABlog.
Main point: media owned ad Networks will have to deliver some sort of extra value to win out. Got it. Link: Online Spin » Blog Archive » The Better Brand Ad Network: Tech Or Media?.
Run by Real Girl Media. Pulling together lots of content from bloggers in a variety of categories. Link: Blissful Food | Blissfully Domestic.